Weekly News – October 3

First Brands drama deepens, Shutterfly’s LME success story, lender voting caps make waves, Liberty PR drop-down, Beyond Meat sheds weight, backstops wobble post-ConvergeOne, and much, much more…

Creditor Corner

Your weekly curated content from the Creditor Rights Coalition

Over 3,400 member subscribers and growing!

We bring you exclusive content from leading data and research providers  


Sign Up Here

In this Week’s Creditor Corner


 First Brands drama deepens, Shutterfly’s LME success story, lender voting caps make waves, Liberty PR drop-down, Beyond Meat sheds weight, backstops wobble post-ConvergeOne, and much, much more…



Featured Content


Bruce Richards on the Markets

 ?Consumer Lending Today: U.S. Household enjoy a collective net worth that is the highest on record: $180 trillion.  


The Next Gen Speaks Up 

ConvergeOne and how the ‘Art of the Deal’ in distress just got a lot more Artistic

Josh Merriam


Scroll through to read all of ou?r content?

Tweet Of The Week

“too tasty to ignore”

Exclusive Content 

The DIP Battle Heatens…..

Click to Access Content

Our Take:

Collateral chaos meets courtroom theatrics — the DIP’s in place, but trust is not. With examiner chatter swirling and Evolution hinting at governance concerns, this is one to watch.

In the news

 No Chapter 11 is complete without a collateral brawl

Click to Access Content

Exclusive Content

The inside scoop….

Click to Access Content

Exclusive Content

the rare LME success story…

Click to Access Content

Our Take:

surprise, surprise, surprise… look what happens when an LME is a deleveraging event and generates incremental free cash flow… something we should all learn from!

Exclusive Content

the latest frontier for creditor on creditor violence

Click to Access Content

Exclusive Content

Puerto Rican dropdown … a financing event, not a dance move

Click to Access Content

In the news

shedding weight….

Click to Access Content

Exclusive Content

analyzing backstops in the SDTX

Click to Access Content

Featured Content

Consumer Lending Today: U.S. Household enjoy a collective net worth that is the highest on record: $180 trillion. 


You might assume that consumer credit is strong given this accumulation of wealth, however, just as there is huge dispersion in market capitalization between companies with the largest enterprise value vs. those at the other end of the spectrum, the same is true for consumers when it comes to net-savings. Sub-prime auto loan and student loan borrowers are experiencing soaring DQ rates. Of the $1.7T student loan debt outstanding, 30% are now 90+ days delinquent. Given the strength of this economic cycle, this is a staggering number. A low FICO score doesn’t necessarily preclude access to credit, but it often comes at a steep cost as borrowers with poor credit face the highest interest rates. Subprime loans such as credit cards, payday loans, student loans, and BNPL financing. experience significantly higher charge-off/loss rates compared to those made to prime borrowers. Most money center banks favor consumer loans to prime borrowers, while ABL managers show a tendency to favor higher risk consumer borrowers. Capital allocators are wise to take a more cautious stance with respect to consumer unsecured loans given the higher loss rates in the private sector. ABL secured by mission-critical tangible assets should be viewed more favorably from my vantage point as the strength of the collateral package and structural protection of the loans result in stronger credit metrics.


FICO scores and corporate credit ratings (e.g., Moody’s, S&P) serve the same fundamental purpose, which is to measure the likelihood that a borrower has to repay its debt (willingness and ability). By measuring payment history, debt-to-assets and debt-to-income ratios, cash flow stability, and liquidity, a credit score can be assigned to a consumer or company. Moody’s and S&P have highly developed and skilled ABS teams with credit models to measure consumer loans that secure structured finance transactions. The rating agencies are adept at assigning a credit score to any given company from AAA to CCC and likewise, can do the same for a diversified pool of consumer loans. Like IG-rated companies that issue bonds at a low yield, high-FICO individuals qualify for better financing terms. The opposite is also true.


Takeaway: Whether it is for your ABL portfolio or public credit structured credit portfolio, Marathon Asset Management continues to heavily underweight consumer unsecured credit (sub-680 FICO). Invest with purpose.

To follow Bruce’s thoughts on the markets, investing and more, follow

@bruce_markets

Featured Content

We are excited to introduce a new feature called the Next Gen Speaks Up to give younger professionals an opportunity to share their perspectives on developments in the restructuring community. 


We are excited to feature Josh Merriam in our inaugural edition. Read on to see how the next generation looks at the art of deal-making in light of recent developments in the ConvergeOne case. 


If you are interested in submitting articles for publication, please email info@creditorcoalition.org. 

Look, the basic organizing principle of finance, and especially of a good old-fashioned corporate bankruptcy, is that some people are more equal than others. The big creditors with the sharpest elbows, the most expensive lawyers, and the debtor on speed dial have always gotten the best deals. That was the point. You formed a club, you cut a deal in a smoky backroom (or, you know, a Zoom call with virtual backgrounds), and you presented it to the minority lenders as a fait accompli. This was not a scandal; it was just how business was done.


Well, a federal judge in Texas has decided to spoil the fun. In a ruling that sent shockwaves through the genteel world of distressed debt, U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen looked at the cozy arrangement in the ConvergeOne bankruptcy and essentially said, “No, you can’t do that.” He established a revolutionary principle, which is that the mere opportunity to get a good deal is, itself, part of the deal. And if you don’t offer it to everyone, you’re breaking the rules. This is, for the bankruptcy business, a genuinely wild new state of affairs.


The Smoky Backroom Playbook

 

To appreciate the earthquake, you have to admire the elegant simplicity of the machine it broke. Imagine you’re a company in Chapter 11. Your most valuable asset isn’t a factory or a patent; it’s certainty. The chaos of bankruptcy is a bonfire of value, and you need to put it out, fast. How? You call up your biggest, friendliest creditors and cut a deal.

 

The deal usually involved two things: an Equity Rights Offering (ERO), where creditors get to buy stock in the NewCo for pennies on the dollar, and Debtor-in-Possession (DIP) financing, which is just a fancy term for the loan that keeps the lights on during the bankruptcy. You, the debtor, would offer the chance to provide this new money exclusively to your chosen friends. In exchange for their cash—and, more importantly, their guaranteed “yes” vote on your restructuring plan—they would get juicy fees, fat interest rates, and all that cheap stock. It was a grand bargain: you bought a smooth, predictable exit from bankruptcy, and your pals got paid handsomely for making it happen.


And the little guys? The minority creditors who weren’t in the club? They got whatever the club decided they got. Their job was to complain a bit and then fall in line. It was efficient. It was ruthless. It worked.

 

The Serta Precedent

 

The first sign that the good times might be ending came from the mattress world. In 2020, Serta Simmons’s big lenders cooked up a deal to let themselves jump to the front of the line, leaving a bunch of other lenders in the dust. They did this using a bit of contractual magic involving an “open market purchase” clause that was, let’s say, creatively interpreted. For years, this was the hot new thing.

 

But in late 2024, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals looked at this maneuver and basically said, “Come on, guys.” A private deal you only offer to your friends is not an “open market.” Words, the court cheekily implied, have to mean something. This was a shot across the bow. It meant judges were suddenly willing to look past the fancy legal footwork and ask a simple question: What’s really going on here?

 

How ConvergeOne Changed the Rules

 

Which brings us to ConvergeOne, where things got really interesting. The plan was classic old-school stuff: a majority group of lenders pre-baked a restructuring that gave them—and only them—the right to backstop the ERO and slurp up all the delicious fees and discounted stock that came with it. The minority lenders, naturally, sued. They pointed to a line in the Bankruptcy Code, §1123(a)(4), that says everyone in a creditor class has to get the “same treatment.”


And Judge Hanen agreed. Leaning on the new “let’s read the words” vibe from the Serta case, he brushed aside the argument that the fees were for a “new service.” The real prize, he said, was the opportunity to even play the game. Offering that golden ticket to some but not others meant the insiders got “significantly higher recoveries.” This, he declared, was obviously not the “same treatment.” And then he dropped the line that will be quoted in legal briefs for years to come: by the time the bankruptcy was filed, “the train had already left the station, and the Minority Lenders were never permitted to board.”

 

And there it is. The bombshell. The chance to participate in a good deal is now officially considered “treatment.” The backroom is seemingly closed for business in the Southern District of Texas yet questions remain.


A Broken Backstop and Slower Money

 

The immediate effect is that the backstop fee is broken. A company used to pay a backstop fee for two things: (1) money and (2) peace. The fee guaranteed you’d have the cash, and because you gave it to your powerful friends, it also guaranteed you’d have the votes to get your plan confirmed.

 

Judge Hanen’s ruling blows this up. If you have to offer the backstop opportunity to everyone in the class, you might be paying a fee to the very creditors who are actively trying to blow up your plan. You’re funding the opposition. You’re still paying the full price for certainty, but you’re getting a whole lot less of it. It’s like buying a first-class ticket and finding out it only guarantees you a spot on the plane, possibly in a middle seat in economy.


We will have to see how far this logic goes. That emergency DIP loan? You can’t just give it to your favorite hedge fund anymore. You have to, in theory, shop it around. This means running a slow, complicated, and public process for what is supposed to be emergency money you need right now. It’s like your house is on fire, but before the fire department can turn on the hose, they have to take bids from other potential firefighting companies. We will see how Judge Lopez handles objections to the upcoming First Brands DIP as a first test of this new principle.

 

The New Arms Race

 

Of course, the market is not just going to sit there and accept this. The fun part is watching the incredibly clever ways people will try to get around it.

 

One popular theory is the “tiered participation” model. It goes something like this: fine, everyone is invited to the party. But there are different levels of fun to be had.


Tier 1: The majority creditors who did all the work get the best deal—the biggest piece of the action, the tastiest fees.


Tier 2: Other creditors can get a pretty good deal, too, but only if they sign a piece of paper promising not to sue anybody.


Tier 3: The holdouts who refuse to play ball get the worst deal, or maybe no deal at all.

 

Is this legal? Who knows! On one hand, it’s a settlement. People settle things. On the other hand, you can just hear a judge asking, “Isn’t this just the same backroom deal in a nicer conference room? Are you paying people off to waive their legal rights?” This is going to be a fun fight.


The bigger, more existential question is whether  this ruling will make it much, much harder to get anything done. Bankruptcy is a collective action problem on a good day. Now, you’ve given every single creditor a powerful new weapon—the threat of a ConvergeOne lawsuit—to get their piece of the pie. 

 

And the final irony? If courts push for a more robust “open market” marketing process runs headlong into the brick wall of information asymmetry: some random outsider can’t just show up and get smart on a billion-dollar mess in a week.. The insiders—the existing creditors on the steering committee—have spent months living and breathing the company’s financials. They know where the bodies are buried. So even if you run a theoretically “open” process for your DIP loan, the only credible bidders are probably… the same insiders as before. You would have  just added six weeks of expensive legal wrangling to arrive at the same answer.

 

The Art of the Very Complicated Deal

 

The ConvergeOne ruling is what happens when a laudable goal—fairness—collides with the messy reality of getting things done. The judge’s decision is a necessary and important check on the tendency of the powerful to steamroll everyone else. But nobody should pretend it has made things simpler.


It has created a gloriously uncertain and complex new game. The war for value isn’t over; the rules of engagement have just been scrambled. The old playbook is toast. The new one is still being written, likely in the form of Byzantine tiered offerings and novel legal theories. One thing is certain: the art of the deal in distress just got a lot more artistic.


***********

Josh Merriam is a junior studying Finance at NYU Stern. He is a Scholar in the Altman-Paulson Initiative on Credit & Distressed Opportunities and will be working at Houlihan Lokey next summer.

 

Copyright Creditor Rights Coalition 2025


Data Download

Bankruptcy — A road to nowhere…

Our Take:

with increasing expense and debtors arriving at deaths door it’s no surprise that BK has lost its rehabilitative potential

Upcoming Events

Linklaters European and Asian Private Credit (New York)

October 8, 2025

Learn More

*New Event* Octus: First Brands Webinar (New York)

October 8, 2025

Learn More

*New Event* Octus: Healthcare Webinar (London)

October 9, 2025

Learn More

GRRLive: Restructuring in the Americas (New York)

October 16, 2025

Learn More

LSTA: Annual Conference (New York)

October 22, 2025

Learn More

Octus: London Credit Seminar (London)

October 23, 2025

Learn More

ABI: 2025 International North American Insolvency Symposium (New York/ Skadden)

November 5, 2025

Learn More

Meet Our 2025 Contributors

Thank You to Our 2025 Sponsors

Platinum Sponsors

Gold Sponsors

Silver Sponsors


Have Something to Share?

Email us at info@creditorcoalition.org